SEPTEMBER 2011
Programmes
Evidence submitted by Bruce Kent, Vice-President of CND
SEPTEMBER 2011
The UK should not remain nuclear weapons state.
Evidence Received by Admiral the Lord Boyce
SEPTEMBER 2011
Evidence received by Dr Julian Lewis MP
JULY 2011
In his evidence Dr Julian Lewis MP maintains that there are political and military arguments in favour of the renewal of Trident. As future military threats and conflicts are difficult to predict, and no-oneknows which enemies we might confront over the next 30–50 years, it is safer for the UK to retain its strategic nuclear deterrent.
Evidence submitted by Bernard Jenkin MP
JULY 2011
The UK should remain a nuclear weapons state. Despite President Obama's Prague speech, the international context in fact is not benign or stable. The threat of a nuclear attack has not disappeared and is unlikely to do so. Future threats are not predictable so as to justify abandoning the UK’s nuclear deterrent. To do this would not only leave the UK vulnerable to nuclear blackmail but would weaken the collective security of NATO and reduce the UK’s international influence.
Evidence submitted by Commodore Tim Hare
JUNE 2011
The UK government policy is one of high visibility, global responsibilities and ambitions. The price the UK pays for undertaking this role on the world stage is that we are more susceptible to global threats than other European countries who adopt a lower profile. As we live in a volatile and uncertain world, the UK should remain a nuclear weapons state.
UK should opt for Trident renewal as it is by far the cheapest and most effective option open to the UK.
Evidence submitted by the Admiral Lord West
MAY 2011
We live in an unpredictable and potentially extremely chaotic and dangerous world. Hence, the UK must not elect to forego its independent nuclear deterrent.
Maintaining the present Trident ballistic missile system which necessitates the replacement of the SSBN’s is the best option assuming the UK is to remain a nuclear weapon state.The other options, in fact, are not as cheap or practical as their supporters claim.