PRESS RELEASE
10
January 2002
Nuclear
Weapons Document Touts Cuts
While Escalating Risks
The
US Nuclear Posture Review (NPR), the first since 1994, was released
this week in private sessions with administration officials and
congressional leaders. While the review promises deep reductions in the US nuclear
arsenal, it also threatens renewed nuclear testing and expanded
roles for the weapons.
In
addition, a significant portion of the nuclear weapons cuts promised
in the NPR, are likely to result in the weapons and missiles being
put into storage rather than being destroyed.
While deactivating US nuclear weapons is a welcome step, the
“hedge” maintained by the Bush administration would allow the
United States to re-deploy the nuclear weapons in the future.
“The
cuts offered in the NPR are a mirage.
The Pentagon isn’t recommending genuine reductions at
all,” noted Dr Ian Davis, BASIC’s director.
“Placing nuclear weapons into storage allows the United
States to sustain its current level of lethality, just in a
different place.”
In
addition, flying in the face of the Clinton administration’s
commitment to the Comprehensive Test-Ban Treaty, the NPR suggests
that the future holds opportunities for nuclear weapons tests.
The review recommends that the United States reduce the time
necessary to prepare its nuclear test sites, a first step toward
resuming nuclear testing. It currently takes two years to prepare a US site for nuclear
testing.
Attention
also was paid to whether nuclear weapons should be used to attack
hardened and deeply-buried targets.
Influential voices within the administration believe that
conventional weapons are ill-equipped to tackle these threats.
While a recent report indicated that the US DoD “has not
defined a requirement for a nuclear weapon for WMD Agent Defeat
missions”, the NPR has examined further research into modifying
existing nuclear weapons to fulfill this role.
In
conjunction with a streamlined, tested nuclear force that may be
enhanced with low-yield weapons, missile defense is endorsed by the
NPR as part of “a transformation of our deterrence posture… to a
force that includes defenses as well as offenses,” according to
Paul Wolfowitz, deputy secretary of defense.
“The
new NPR increases risks, and doesn’t decrease the nuclear
threat,” said Mark Bromley, analyst at BASIC.
“Rather than confronting proliferation with diplomatic
tools and measures to regulate weapons materials and technologies,
the United States is placing nuclear weapons at the very heart of
its strategic planning for years to come.
Building up a fortress of offensive and defensive systems
will only serve to increase global tensions and does little to
tackle the security threats faced globally.”
For
more information, please contact:
Mark Bromley at +44 (0)20 7407 2977 or
Christine Kucia at +1 202 347 8340
Back to U.S.
Nuclear Policy
|